![]() The Trickster, for example, has a new Spectral Spike option that adds a 100% chance to deal additional damage when using skills that scales with one’s Anomaly Power – some of these new additions are no joke!Īfter reaching max level, you’ll also unlock Ascension Points, which allow you to over-level your character’s abilities up to 200 times. Pax Points, which are earned by progressing through the campaign and unlock new perks that expand on the already incredibly extensive skill trees found in the base game. Hell, Painkiller STILL beats the ♥♥♥♥ out of most modern FPS.But the highlight for me is that Worldslayer introduces not one, but two new progression systems that will make your Outrider even more badass. Cutting them a LITTLE slack? Isn't a bad thing.īut I will admit, I adore PCF as they have a delightful track record of some of the best shooters around. The point I was framing is that, by all means? They didn't have to do ♥♥♥♥ at all. Hes a shockjock who has good points now and then, but hes also as nitpicky as it gets and whines about the most asinine things sometimes and his fans just DEVOUR his opinion as the word of God itself.Īs for your cook point. But to base 100% of their dislike because they couldn't run it at max settings? I've seen youtubers base their whole opinion on ONE thing they didn't approve of or that X thing didn't run perfect and people eat it up. Not to say Cyberpunk was without its flaws. I also know people who RAGED because they couldn't run the game on ultra 4K settings and the amount of hate they screamed EASY drowned out any praise that might of happened. ![]() I know PLENTY of people who thought Cyberpunk was perfectly fine. I'd say it makes up for more then a 'small part' of quality. If a cook servers you bad food, but then gives you better food, would you call that an outstanding and applaudable move? Patching bad demo - better first impression - more sales. Bad demo - bad first impression - less sales. Patching a buggy demo isn't anything outstanding. ![]() You were talking about patching the demo, not about offering it. To not give the company SOME credit comes off as edgy in my opinion. 99.9% of companies don't even put out demos anymore and PCF patched the damned thing multiple times. Personal preferences, low standards, high standards and all that follows on top of that and only makes a small part of a game's quality.Īs for the demo patching.dude, get off it. Optimisation, bugs, glitches, balance, etc.pp. It's mostly about the execution of the game. Quality isn't about liking or not liking stuff. Originally posted by Azazel:What makes a game 'quality' to one might differ to another. PCF have some of the best shooters around, so I'm good with my preorder. Or, in Outriders case, play the demo find out if I enjoy the gameplay.Īs for the demo patching.dude, get off it. I'd rather watch the video without Billybobjoedannyfrank rambling in my ears about why he or she personally liked/dislike X thing in the game and decide for myself. I don't think there has been a game I ever got that I bothered to take someone else opinion into consideration personally. ![]() But you'll find many people who hate the game completely due to its endgame issues only. End game was lacking, but still, an enjoyable romp. But I, personally, enjoyed the story as is two friends of mine who played it and we ran through the story together. What makes a game 'quality' to one might differ to another. In terms of trust, common sense should suggest the exact opposite of what you wrote: If a developer doesn't manage to present a quality demo of the game right before release, how will they manage to present a quality product at release? It's in their interest to get things fixed in order to motivate customers to buy the finished game. The demo had many issues, which leads to a bad user experience. I mean, come on, they patched a demo.That's noting special or honorable. Without reviews you'd always be a labrat and waste lots of money on crap games.Īlso, I trust the devs to do whats good for the game. You don't do "what they do", you just inform yourself about the quality of the game - positive aspects as well as negative aspects. (Good) reviews are there to give you a rough overview of the game. Don't do what people tell you to do, try it for yourself. Originally posted by Azazel:I'd rather not run by reviews.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |